
In the spirit of enhancing my knowledge of Clerkenwell, I've just finished reading Ackroyd's 2002 novel The Clerkenwell Tales. It pulls together many strands of his enormous learning - medieval language and literature, social and religious history, and a street-by-street knowledge of Clerkenwell - in the framework of a medieval mystery novel.
It's 1399, and Henry Bolingbroke is leading his army against Richard II. Meanwhile Dominus, a secret group of clerics and city leaders, is in cohoots with an apocalyptic religious sect led by a mad nun. Spicy stuff, and in the wrong hands it could have turned out like The Da Vinci Code.
Ackroyd takes the characters from Chaucer's Canterbury Tales and imagines their lives in London. Except they turn out to be rather different to Chaucer's pilgrims. The Wife of Bath, for example, is not Chaucer's good-time girl cannily working her way through husbands and their fortunes, but a brothel keeper in Turnmill Street, notorious home of medieval stews and bawdhouses, pimping a 13-year-old girl to an elderly lawyer.
It's amazing for local detail - like the labyrinth of tunnels between the convent and the priory for clandestine assignations, and the mystery plays held on Clerkenwell Green. Acrkroyd immerses you in a radically alien understanding of the world, in which your doctor will read your humours and prescribe green ginger, poached eggs and marigold juice. There's lots of farting and appalling table manners.
Historical fact and fiction melt into an authentic whole. But as a novel it's only partially successful. The rapidly changing point of view - following a multitude of different characters - means there is no central character to invest your emotions in. And the need to explain words or interpret beliefs often gets in the way of the plot, encumbering the emotional development of the novel.
Not a bedtime page turner, but it would be hard to find a better way of imagining yourself into Clerkenwell 600 years ago.